Friday, 22 August 2025

1000th Blog Post!

 Blimey, who would have thought it, 1000 posts! Particularly given some very fallow periods over the years since I started blogging in 2008. 2011/12 seemed to be particularly poor years for some reason, but I found my feet again in 2013.

Now I'm retired my 'job' is apparently creating content for the blog, so many many thanks to my loyal readers over the years and particularly those who comment. It is much appreciated. 

I've been doing some nostalgic stuff recently, what with re-visiting WRG 1925 to 50, (re) buying Traveller etc so I thought it might be apt to review some of my personal wargaming milestones. 



This is what kicked it all off for me, Charles Grants 'Battle'. I would only have been about 10 or 11 when I got these, and prior to that I'd just been pushing around Airfix figures with some very notional 'rules' which me and my friends had made up.


I was just entranced by the concepts, the presentation and the various illustrations. The 'Programmed Instruction' approach was of course formalised by Squad Leader late in the decade, but this is where it happened first.


The account I loved the most was 'Reconnaissance in Force', as although I did manage to both the smaller scenarios from the book as well as ones I designed myself, I never had enough kit to tackle this one.


The introduction of 6mm figures was a boon for a cash strapped kid, and although we tried a number of rules for the 6mm which came out in the early 1970s, this was the set which stuck. What a fabulous set of rules and they felt a lot more serious and grounded in reality than some of them. 

The 20mm stuff was put aside and we played lots of games with these instead.


Similarly with Napoleonics, we started with Bruce Quarrie and Airfix figures but rapidly moved on to the WRG 1685 to 1845 set with 6mm figures. My friend David and I took it in turns to host games, and we both perfected means of safely transporting our 6mm armies by bike from one end of town to the other.



Here is the hand drawn area campaign map I did for an Imagi-Nations campaign in the late 1970s between Hofenburg and Norvonia, who bore a strong resemblance to Britain and France in terms of their troops if little in terms of geography.


And a load of pre-generated battlefields using the WRG terrain generator to go with it. Blimey, the industry of youth.

As the 70s wore into the 80s I became increasingly distracted by boardgames, RPGs and later on, computer games. Having left University and with work and a young family, computer games were a much better fit for my lifestyle and although I still hung onto a lot of my old figure and boardgame stuff, they didn't get played.

There was a long figure gaming hiatus from the mid 1980s until the late 1990s when I discovered this....


Command Decision (yes I know these are the Army lists, the rules are in the loft). Many thanks to the Mansfield Wargames Club for switching me on to the possibilities of more modern rules which were both realistic but allowed me to fight the battalion+ sized engagements I'd aspired to when I first read "Battle" 25 years before.  


In fact CD2 was rapidly superceded at Mansfield by Spearhead, an even more streamlined set which allowed for even greater megalomania. I  became more aware of the concept of 'design for effect' as a result of playing these and I still think the command system hasn't been bettered for grand tactical WW2 gaming.

Eventually, dragging over to Mansfield became something of a chore and I bit the bullet and managed to find some like minded people at Sheffield Wargames Society (you know who you are!).


One of the big things at the time was the newly released AK47 Republic, and along with being good for modern African games, they allowed me to scratch my long standing itch to play the Spanish Civil War using my 'Mexicanski 36' variant, which proved surprisingly long lived. 

I've been a member of SWS and Wargames Developments for over 25 years now, longer than the period between reading 'Battle' and 'Command Decision' and figure gaming, rules and scenario design now seem to be a permanent fixture of what I do. 

I greatly enjoy recording what I've been doing on the blog, it helps me keep tabs on things and I hope at least some of it is of interest to people out there. One thing I'm not very good at is keeping the rules and scenario downloads section up to date, I just seem to prefer doing game and modelling reports. I'll have a look at what is in the other sections at some point. 

Anyway, thanks for reading, and we will see if I make it to 2000 posts before Google decide to replace blogger with some AI abomination. 



35 comments:

  1. Congrats on making it into 4 figures Martin!
    A very nice nostalgia post. Your late 70s Campaign map is intriguing - do the numbers in the boxes relate to the size of town?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. I honestly can't recall what the numbers mean, I expect I have my campaign notes somewhere. Probably something to do with supply. I've just realised that the photo is upside down!

      Delete
  2. Hello Martin!

    Congratulations on 1000 posts! That is a significant effort and I am glad you do so as I do enjoy your posts. You have been busy with the posts these last few years, at least compared to the early years of the blog.

    I did enjoy your trip down memory lane, different rules but similar path as mine (and likely many others :-))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Shaun. I'm seemingly in a pattern of three a week at the moment. Not sure how long I'll keep that up as there are only so many extra bits and pieces I can paint, but it seems OK for now.

      Delete
  3. My first wargaming book was also Battle at about the same age. Charles Grant inspired many small boys to get into the hobby. Your journey is familiar and nice to read.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. I seem to know quite a few people who started with Don Featherstone, but he never made any impact on me at the time.

      Delete
  4. Martin, we seem to have shared a similar journey.
    I think it was Charles Grant's The Ancient Wargame and The Wargame which turned me from modeller to wargamer, but my first proper rules that had an influence was Operation Warboard by Gavin Lyall. I even made a template from the clear plastic Airfix kit packages!
    I too went the WRG 1685 -1845 route for SYW and FIW.
    Rather than Command Decision, I discovered Combined Arms, the modern version first before backdating to CD. Went it proved too fatiguing to run, we switched to Spearhead. I also dabbled with AK47. There were many other rulesets often without the figures to play them!

    I too use my blog as somewhere to track what I've achieved or bits of research. I'm still amazed anyone but me reads it!

    Congratulations on 1000 posts!
    Neil

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Operation Warboard was another set which passed me by for some reason, although my gaming friend Pete showed me his copy when we were at University. Similarly Combined Arms, whereas I first saw Command Decision in the Games Centre at some point in the 1980s. The world was a smaller place then.

      Delete
  5. Your post title attracted me, as I think I am on 995, so must make sure I don't miss the millennium post! Congratulations on reaching a significant milestone! The history of your wargaming experience is a pretty good idea too, I think I will probably pinch it when the time comes for my thousandth post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I will look forward to it. I suddenly noticed a few weeks ago that the 'published' count was up in the 980s and thought it was worth doing something special.

      Delete
  6. Never had a copy of Battle - I came to wargames via Charge!, Feathersone and The War Game - but your post inspired me to look for a reasonable s/h copy and I was lucky to find one (after just missing one sold on ebayuk at 0904 this morning!) and have it on order. I always enjoyed reading Charles Grant's and articles, so this will be a nostalgic treat.
    Congratulations on your thousandth post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. My current copy of Battle is also second hand, as I sold my original along with some other stuff some days cades ago. It is such a great book. The original Meccano Magazine articles are also available 'on the internet' (I can't find the link right now) which include some articles which didn't make it into the book, although they mainly seem to make infantry even slower!

      Delete
    2. Here you go if you are interested:
      https://wargaming.info/2011/charles-grant-battle-practical-wargaming/

      Delete
    3. Martin - looks like the links on that web page are disabled due to copyright.....
      Forgot to say that Imagi-Nation campaign looks intriguing!
      Neil

      Delete
    4. Yes, he said he'd pulled the links to the magazine article scans. I think you can still download the individual magazines though. The ones on terrain weren't that interesting (infantry half move up steep hills, that sort of thing) but the 54mm game was a hoot.

      Delete
  7. Congratulations - commitments to blogging takes a lot of effort that is not always appreciated in this fast click world.

    Lovely to see a nostalgic journey through rule set covers. It seems impossible to exactly put my finger on why seeing such things makes my pulse race, I think it is one of those things of ‘you had to be there’ riding that wave of exploration, discovery and boom of wargaming immersion to be touched by those visual links.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Yes, it is hard to describe the power of these old books. I cant help thinking that the bulk of my gaming projects now are about recapturing the youthful excitement of those early days. Doomed to fail as the past is another country, but we can still try.

      Delete
  8. Congratulations on reaching this milestone! Here's to the next thousand blog posts!

    All the best,

    Bob

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Bob. Let's hope I can maintain the same energy and persistence with the hobby as you have.

      Delete
  9. Congratulations on reaching 1000 posts and for your mini ‘biography’ through rules systems. Airfix figures and books which used these figures and models have played so much of a part in many a gamer’s life.
    As you say, your 2000th post will be happily written for you in seconds by A.I. before you even think of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks LOL. Yes, I imagine the massed ranks of AI servers are already red hot processing this post in anticipation of what is to come.

      Delete
  10. Congratulations on reaching 1,000 posts, Martin!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Congratulations on 1000 posts Martin!
    Interesting reading your wargaming 'journey'. Similar to lots of us of a certain age. Loved gaming with those 1685-1845 rules!
    Chris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. I think the 1685 to 1845 set are often overlooked and under rated in the history of Wargaming. I remember reading a very sniffy review in Military Modelling at the time (you need to roll 6 to hit with howitzers!). Our mistake was fighting with full strength Quarrie like battalions of 16 to 20 figures, we should have gone with field strengths of ten, but even so we usually managed to field a whole division plus a cavalry brigade. It is a shame I never took any photos of Waterloo in 20mm with WRG, which we played one weekend in 1987. 1:200 figure ratio, so a 'battalion' represented a brigade or so.

      Delete
  12. Congrats on sustaining the blog over time and reaching this milestone. Thanks for the trip down memory lane, too. It's always interesting to see other people's wargaming roots, particularly those that stretch back to when I was getting started as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. We will see if I can keep up the pace, but there are still so many games to play, and less and less time left....

      Delete
  13. Martin -
    Seems you have picked up the pace in the last 5-6 years! Archduke Piccolo has been going almost as long and still well short of 800 posts, let alone 1000! I discover it has had over a million visits - a 'milestone' that came and went 'like a thief in the night'! At any rate: congratulations upon

    My WW2 journey began with Bruce Quarrie's Airfix rule set, which, though problematic in some areas, were quite a playable set. I have copies of Grant's 'Battle' and the Lyall's 'Operation Warboard', but have hardly ever played them. I tried writing my own set (based upon what I could remember of 'Squad Leader', but 'Command Decision' was my really big entree into developing my WW2 armies. Now, these have been largely displaced by the Bob Cordery Portable Wargames rule sets, with some very interesting battles.

    At any rate, congratulations upon maintaining such an engaging blogspot, full of interest. I'll be looking forward to years more of absorbing reading and ideas.
    Cheers,
    Ion

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, and congratulations on 1000000 views. Few bloggers have such reach, although there are a couple of others in a similar position who have commented on the blog. I think lockdown and retirement have helped with the output. I'm also inspired by other people's posts and Im fortunate in having a regular gaming group to try stuff out with.

      I just love the Portable Wargame concept , big battles in small spaces. Bingo!

      I'm not sure the current level of output is sustainable in the long run, but I enjoy posting and hopefully I can keep up some level of consistency.

      Delete
  14. Very impressive, Martin, congratulations on the milestone. I appreciate everything you’ve shared.

    V/R,
    Jack

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jack, and thank you for your posts too. Your energy and enthusiasm is astonishing.

      Delete
  15. Great trip down your Wargames path. Thanks. I got battle gaming in lock down! It is still a great read even if the language is bit old fashioned. The process and methods are simply practical and the visual build of units along with text equals the stuff you get in modern expensive rule books. Best wishes for your next 1000 posts!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. Some of "Battle" does seem a bit archaic to modern eyes, but I think the whole thing hangs together very coherently as a body of work.

      Delete
  16. Very well done on reaching this milestone! Interesting that you mention 1685-1845, they were the most divisive 'marmite' rules I came across whilst gaming in a club. I did note that games with those rules tended to actually finish, and those games using other rules (e.g. Newbury), did not...I don't think I have ever played 'Battle' or 'AK47 Republic', I will have to give them a go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the WRG Napoleonics were pretty marmite at the time too, particularly for those used to casualty rosters at one extreme or bounce sticks and cannister templates at the other. As you say, we did manage to actually finish games in a sensible length of time.

      I think you'd find Battle rather simplistic these days, but AK47 had a lot of clever stuff going on. I particularly liked the randomised movement, treatment of beaten zones and integration of random events into the combat mechanism. I played far more WW1 , SCW and WW2 games with them than I ever did 'modern Africa'. To 21st century eyes the latter might seem rather distasteful after Rwanda etc.

      Delete